Barack Hussein Obama admits that in his view tax policy is less about revenue and more about "fairness," so even if you collect less revenue, it's better to punish the evil "rich" (anyone with a job basically under liberals' definition) than to let people enjoy the fruits of their labor. Can one of you libs do me a favor and answer the folloiwng questions: (1) where does the government get the moral authority to take the fruits of one person's labor and give them to another? (In 1850, we had a system like that in the southern states. You may have heard it. We called it "slavery." (2) Why is letting someone keep the money he or she earns "giving" them something, as in the hackneyed and idiotic liberal mantra "tax cuts for the rich?"